Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

95 N.J.L. 263

State v. Gruich

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 8, 1920

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1920-11-08

On error to the Sup 1 erne Court, in whiph court the following per curiam wots filed : “The defendant in this case was convicted of committing an abortion on Helen Hunter, on the 14th day of June, 1918. After the jury had retired to consider their verdict, they came into court and the following- incident occurred: The Foreman — Wo, we cannot -agree.’ The Court — ‘I see no reason why you should not agree upon a verdict.

Decided 1920-11-08

Per CuRIAM.

¶1We agree with the Supreme Court as to- the only point discussed in its opinion. It was not necessary to discuss the alleged error in excluding Hunter’s testimony, as the inquiry was afterward taken up by the state and answered. Let the judgment be affirmed.

For affirmance — Swayze, TeeNchaRd, BergeN, Ivaliscti, IyATZENBACH, WHITE, HePPENHEIMBR, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER, ACKERSON, JJ. 11.For reversal — -None.
/95/njl/263 · .json · Public domain