State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
45 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2024 · most notably Franklin v. Anderson (2006), State v. Provens, 2007-Ca-00034 (8-4-2008) (2008)
45 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Bradley · Jones v. Barnes · State v. Murnahan · State v. Spivey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no genuine issue as to whether [he] was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel on appeal * * *”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“of ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal.' State v. Spivey , 84 Ohio St.3d at 25 , 701 N.E.2d 696 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Moreover, to justify reopening his appeal, Smith `bears the burden of establishing that there was a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.