95 Wash. 2d
Volume 95 — Washington Reports, Second Series
95 opinions
- 95 Wash. 2d 1State v. Coyle (1980)
- 95 Wash. 2d 15State v. Alexis (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 20Dunbar v. Heinrich (1980)
- 95 Wash. 2d 28Hahn v. Boeing Company (1980)
- 95 Wash. 2d 38In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McNerthney (1980)
- 95 Wash. 2d 43State v. Sieler (1980)
- 95 Wash. 2d 56Hupe v. Coates (1980)
- 95 Wash. 2d 62Bornhoeft v. Bornhoeft (1980)
- 95 Wash. 2d 66Robroy Land Co. v. Prather (1980)
- 95 Wash. 2d 78Schafer v. Schafer (1980)
- 95 Wash. 2d 83State v. Bird (1980)
- 95 Wash. 2d 94Wagner v. Wagner (1980)
- 95 Wash. 2d 105Ertman v. City of Olympia (1980)
- 95 Wash. 2d 108Green River Community College v. Higher Education Personnel Board (1980)
- 95 Wash. 2d 124Norris v. Norris (1980)
- 95 Wash. 2d 143State v. Houser (1980)
- 95 Wash. 2d 170State v. Simpson (1980)
- 95 Wash. 2d 203In Re the Personal Restraint of Keene (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 216In Re the Personal Restraint of Young (1980)
- 95 Wash. 2d 237deElche v. Jacobsen (1980)
- 95 Wash. 2d 257Woodson v. State (1980)
- 95 Wash. 2d 265McNeal v. Allen (1980)
- 95 Wash. 2d 280State v. Tacoma-Pierce County Multiple Listing Service (1980)
- 95 Wash. 2d 297State v. Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage Co. (1980)
- 95 Wash. 2d 306Keogan v. Holy Family Hospital (1980)
- 95 Wash. 2d 332Hoppe v. King County (1980)
- 95 Wash. 2d 341Pacific Gamble Robinson Co. v. Lapp (1980)
- 95 Wash. 2d 357In Re the Personal Restraint of Lee (1980)
- 95 Wash. 2d 373Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. Wiscomb (1980)
- 95 Wash. 2d 385State v. Theroff (1980)
- 95 Wash. 2d 394Woodruff v. McClellan (1980)
- 95 Wash. 2d 398Pamelin Industries, Inc. v. Sheen-U.S.A., Inc. (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 424Hoagland v. Mount Vernon School District No. 320 (1981)
<bold>[1] Schools and School Districts — Teachers — Discharge — Direct</bold> <bold>Appeal — Scope.</bold> Under RCW 28A.58.515, a teacher who appeals a finding of probable cause for discharge directly to superior court without a prior hearing before the school board or its hearing officer is entitled to a full evidentiary hearing as to the existence of sufficient cause for discharge. <bold>[2] Schools and School Districts — Teachers — Discharge —</bold> <bold>Sufficient Cause — What Constitutes.</bold> A teacher's conduct does not provide sufficient cause for his discharge under RCW 28A.58.450-.515 unless it has a material and substantial adverse effect upon his performance as a teacher. <bold>[3] Schools and School Districts — Teachers — Discharge —</bold> <bold>Sufficient Cause — Felony Conviction.</bold> A teacher's conviction of a felony does not, by itself, constitute sufficient cause for his discharge. <bold>[4] Schools and School Districts — Teachers — Discharge —</bold> <bold>Sufficient Cause — Considerations.</bold> Whether a teacher's conduct provides sufficient cause for his discharge is determined by considering the age and maturity of the students, the existence and degree of adverse effects upon students and other teachers, the period of time elapsed since the conduct occurred, the circumstances surrounding the conduct and the likelihood of its repetition, the teacher's motives, and the effect of the conduct on the rights of the teacher involved and other teachers.<page_number>Page 425</page_number> <bold>[5] Schools and School Districts — Teachers — Discharge —</bold> <bold>Sufficient Cause — Issue of Fact.</bold> Evidence of mitigating circumstances surrounding the complained of conduct of a teacher together with evidence that the conduct has not adversely affected his competence as a teacher create an issue of fact as to the existence of sufficient cause for discharging the teacher. WILLIAMS, J., concurs in the result only; ROSELLINI, J., dissents by separate opinion; DORE and DIMMICK, JJ., did not participate in the disposition of this case.
- 95 Wash. 2d 424Hoagland v. MOUNT VERNON SCHOOL DIST. (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 439Aungst v. ROBERTS CONSTRUCTION CO. (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 445Clark County Sheriff v. Department of Social & Health Services (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 453In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Miller (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 458State v. Eisner (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 464Mission Insurance v. Allendale Mutual Insurance (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 469State v. Frampton (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 531Bennett v. Department of Labor & Industries (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 536State v. Hall (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 541In Re the Personal Restraint of Shriner (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 545In Re the Personal Restraint of Little (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 551In Re the Personal Restraint of Bush (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 556Zobrist v. Culp (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 563Nisqually Delta Ass'n v. City of DuPont (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 574Jenkins v. Bellingham Municipal Court (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 583Longview Fibre Co. v. Weimer (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 593Sanchez v. Haddix (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 600Zesbaugh, Inc. v. General Steel Fabricating, Inc. (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 605In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against Nelson (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 606In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against Koehler (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 616State v. Jones (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 629State v. Claborn (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 638Northwest Gillnetters Ass'n v. Sandison (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 648In Re the Personal Restraint of Haynes (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 655State v. Christian (1981)
<bold>[1] Appeal and Error — Findings of Fact — Failure To Assign</bold> <bold>Error — Effect.</bold> Unchallenged findings of fact are accepted as verities on review. <bold>[2] Searches and Seizures — Standing To Challenge — Expectation</bold> <bold>of Privacy — Test.</bold> A person may not object to a warrantless search unless he has exhibited an actual expectation of privacy in the area searched and that expectation is recognized as objectively reasonable by society. <bold>[3] Searches and Seizures — Standing To Challenge — Expectation</bold> <bold>of Privacy — Termination of Tenancy — Abandonment.</bold> A tenant who gives notice of his intent to terminate his tenancy, who is informed that the landlord intends to enter the premises upon his termination of the tenancy, and whose activities indicate his abandonment of the premises does not retain a reasonable expectation of privacy as to personal property remaining on the premises. <bold>[4] Searches and Seizures — Consent — Common Authority —</bold> <bold>Assumption of Risk.</bold> A person who lacks sole control or undisputed possession over a particular area may not object to another person's consent to a search of the area if under the circumstances it can be said that the first person assumed the risk of such a search.
- 95 Wash. 2d 661Whitaker v. Spiegel, Inc. (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 679Fahn v. Cowlitz County (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 686Bell v. Hegewald (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 693Zoutendyk v. Washington State Patrol (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 699In Re the Marriage of Gimlett (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 706State v. Lair (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 722Gould v. Mutual Life Insurance (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 726Van Dyke v. Thompson (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 739Johnson v. Tradewell Stores, Inc. (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 753State v. Thompson (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 760State v. LaCaze (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 769Kirk v. Pierce County Fire Protection District No. 21 (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 769Kirk v. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 773Hansen v. Washington Natural Gas Co. (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 789Emery v. Oberquell (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 791Culinary Workers & Bartenders Union, Local No. 596 v. Gateway Cafe, Inc. (1982)
- 95 Wash. 2d 799State v. Wheeler (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 809Hindquarter Corp. v. Property Development Corp. (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 822Hocker v. Woody (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 828State v. Wilson (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 835Watters v. Doud (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 841Allen v. American Land Research (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 853City of Everett v. Estate of Sumstad (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 858State v. Haner (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 871Peters v. Sjoholm (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 888State v. Thompson (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 898State v. Seagull (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 909McDonald Industries, Inc. v. Rollins Leasing Corp. (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 917State v. Adlington-Kelly (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 931State v. Rotunno (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 936In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Witteman (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 940In Re the Personal Restraint of Taylor (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 944Henry George & Sons, Inc. v. Cooper-George, Inc. (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 954State v. Campbell (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 959Martinez v. Kinville (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 962Green River Community College v. Higher Education Personnel Board (1981)
- 95 Wash. 2d 963Mac Amusement Co. v. Department of Revenue (1981)