952 So. 2d 21 - State v. Walder’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2009
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 441 So. 2d 732 - State v. Lynch · State v. Chapman · State v. Soco · 542 So. 2d 154 - State v. Russland Enterprises, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A. When a person is charged with cruelty to animals, said person's animal may be seized by the arresting officer and held pursuant to this Section. B. (1) The seizing officer shall notify the owner of the seized animal of the provisions of this Section by posting written notice at the location where the animal was seized or by leaving it with a person of suitable age and discretion residing at that location within twenty-four hours of the seizure. (2) The seizing officer shall photograph the animal within fifteen days after posting of the notice of seizure and shall cause an affidavit to be prepared in order to document its condition in accordance with R.S. 15:436.2. (3) The seizing officer shall appoint a licensed veterinarian or other suitable custodian to care for any such animal. The custodian shall retain custody of the animal in accordance with this Section. (4) The seized animal shall be held by the custodian provided for in Paragraph (3) for a period of fifteen consecutive days, including weekends and holidays, after such notice of seizure is given. Thereafter, if a person who claims an interest in such animal has not posted bond in accordance with Subsection C, the animal may be humanely disposed of by sale, adoption, or euthanasia. C. A person claiming an interest in any animal seized pursuant to this Section may prevent the disposition of the animal as provided for in Subsection B by posting a bond with the court within fifteen days after receiving notice of such s”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Walder understands and acknowledges that upon signing this transfer of ownership of the animals, St. Tammany has sole ownership and control of the animals and that St. Tammany has the sole right to determine the disposition of the animals which includes but is not limited to the sale, adoption or destruction of the animals.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the amount of expenses incurred from the date of the seizure of the animals in question to the date of the transfer of ownership of the animals to the parish”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Walder
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.