Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

955 A.2d 1012

Commonwealth v. EL

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 28, 2008

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2008-08-28

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2009

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2008-08-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 AND NOW, this 28th day of AUGUST, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:

(1) Is a criminal defendant’s request to represent himself or herself timely where the defendant makes the request after the denial of a pre-trial *1013 motion and just prior to the commencement of a bench trial?
(2) At a bench trial, where a defendant has indicated his or her readiness to proceed pro se, is it an abuse of discretion to deny the pro se request without conducting a colloquy as required by Pa.R.Crim.P. 121(C)?

¶3 The parties are directed to submit the matter on briefs.

Justice TODD did not participate in the consideration or decision in this matter.
/955/a2d/1012 · .json · Public domain