Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

956 F.2d 1162

Docket No. 91-7298.

Hamm v. Jackson

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Feb. 20, 1992. Decided March 9, 1992.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-03-09

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on In Re Ronald Brown G. Elaine Brown

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-03-09

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. Norwood Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge; Paul Trevor Sharp, Magistrate Judge. (CA-89-588-S-C)

Joseph L. Hamm, appellant pro se.

Ronna Dawn Gibbs, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Joseph L. Hamm appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hamm v. Jackson, No. CA-89-588-S-C (M.D.N.C. Aug. 19, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/956/f2d/1162 · .json · Public domain