96 N.J.L. 299
Decided June 20, 1921
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1921-06-20
<p>On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 95 N. J. L. 321.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1921-06-20
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 1946
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
¶2For affirmance — The Chancellor, Cuter Justice, Trenciiard, Bergen, Minturn, Ivatzenbacii, White, HepPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, GARDNER, JJ. 10.
¶3For reversal—FTone.