Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

96 Or. App. 735

State v. Kendall

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 24, 1989

Court of Appeals of Oregon · decided 1989-05-24

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1989

1 state decisions

Applies OR 136 § 136.001

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-05-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM

¶1In a trial to the court, defendant was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He contends that the court erred in denying his pretrial motion to suppress evidence. We hold that the court did not err in denying that motion. However, we reverse because of the lack of a written waiver of trial by jury.

¶2Consent to be tried without a jury requires an express written waiver. Or Const, Art I, § 11; ORS 136.001. Although the state concedes that there is no written waiver in the record, it argues that, because defendant did not object or otherwise raise the issue in the trial court, he has not preserved the error for review. However, the error is apparent on the face of the record and we will consider it. ORAP 7.19(5). See State v. McDaniel, 96 Or App 337, 772 P2d 951 (1989).

¶3Judgment reversed and remanded for a new trial.

/96/orapp/735 · .json · Public domain