State v. J.J.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “In Murrin, the State sought modification of Murrin's community supervision when he violated its terms by possessing burglary tools and taking a motor vehicle without permission. Based on this conduct, the trial court imposed an additional 15 days detention. When the State later charged Murrin with theft of the motor vehicle, the trial court granted Murrin's motion to dismiss on the basis that RCW 13.40.070(3) required the State to choose between modification or an information. The trial court in this case distinguished Murrin's situation from J.J.'s on the theory that in Murrin,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In Re JJ

2. “under RCW 13.40.070(3). If it is, the trial court erred by allowing the State to revoke J.J.'s deferred adjudication and charge him with a new crime. This court reviews a trial court's application of law de novo. [5] At the time of J.J.'s deferred adjudication, RCW 13.40.125 provided that”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In Re JJ

3. “for the purposes of RCW 13.40.070(3). We hold that it does not and affirm. FACTS On September 18, 1997, J.J. received an Order of Deferred Adjudication on a second degree theft charge. A week later, John Charleston, the”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In Re JJ