Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

963 F.2d 368

Docket No. 92-6233.

Williams v. Williams E H E

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: April 21, 1992 Decided: May 26, 1992

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-05-26

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Taylor Nuth Taylor v. L Robinson

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-05-26

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Timothy Lamont Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Timothy Lamont Williams appeals from the district court's orders denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Williams, No. CA-90-392-AM (E.D. Va. Apr. 29, 1991 and Dec. 5, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/963/f2d/368 · .json · Public domain