Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

963 So. 2d 927

Docket No. 4D07-1299.

Florence v. State

Danielle Shaumika FLORENCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 29, 2007.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2007-08-29

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2008

1 state decisions

Relies on Martone v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-08-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Danielle Shaumika Florence, Fort Lauderdale, pro se.

¶2Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Julie D. Lindahl, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4We reverse the order denying appellant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion. The trial court failed to attach portions of the record that refute appellant's claim that she is entitled to credit for time previously served in prison prior to her violation of probation. Martone v. State,922 So.2d 404 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D). We remand for the trial court to attach portions of the record that conclusively refute the appellant's claim or for any other appropriate relief.

¶5GUNTHER, WARNER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

/963/so2d/927 · .json · Public domain