Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

966 F.2d 1446

Docket No. 92-6348.

Manuel H. Venable v. L. Douglas Wilder

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: June 1, 1992 Decided: June 12, 1992

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-06-12

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915

Relies on Williams v. Catoe

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-06-12

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CA-91-1618-AM)

Manuel H. Venable, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Manuel H. Venable appeals from the district court's order dismissing this civil action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C.s 1915(d) (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Venable v. Wilder, No. CA-91-1618-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 5, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/966/f2d/1446 · .json · Public domain