Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

968 F.2d 1211

Docket No. 92-6565.

Hicks v. Toney

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: June 24, 1992 Decided: July 20, 1992

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-07-20

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Charles L. Reynard, Jr. v. Montgomery County Jail Lieutenant Keys

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-07-20

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-91-825-R)

Robert Hicks, Appellant Pro Se.

William Rundahl Coleman, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Robert Hicks appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hicks v. Toney, No. CA-91-825-R (W.D. Va., May 15, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/968/f2d/1211 · .json · Public domain