Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

97 A.3d 1202

Commonwealth v. Neidig

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 19, 2014

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2014-08-19

Decided 2014-08-19

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2AND NOW, this 19th day of August, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The judgment of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court to consider the implications of Pa.R.A.P. 1925(c), as outlined in the dissenting statement by Judge Fitzgerald. See Pa.R.A.P. 1925(c)(3) (where an “appellate court is convinced that counsel has been per se ineffective, the appellate court shall remand for the filing of a Statement nunc pro tunc and for the preparation and filing of an opinion by the judge.”).

/97/a3d/1202 · .json · Public domain