¶1In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas.
¶2For opinion below, see 89 Fed. 11. C. N.
¶3Sterry (Eugene Hagan and I. E. Lambert, on the brief), for plaintiff in error.
¶4W. C. Cochran (J. McD. Trimble and W. H. Wallace, on the brief), for defendant in error.
¶5Before CALDWELL, SANBORN, and THAYER, Circuit Judges.
¶7This case was submitted at the same time, by the same counsel, on the same argument, and involves the same questions, which have been considered and decided in the preceding case of Lantry v. Wallace (C. C. A.) 97 Fed. 865. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment in the ease in hand is affirmed; Judge SANBORN dissenting.