Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 F.2d 258 - Woolley v. United States

Woolley v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

97 F.2d 258 · 1938

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
May 2009
most recently cited

46 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2009 · most notably Hannah v. Larche (1960), 12 Cal. 3d 512 - McCartney v. Commission on Judicial Qualifications (1974)

46 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

29019381940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77A (§ 1 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 77S (§ 19 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 77U (§ 21 of the Securities Act of 1933)

Relies on Blair v. United States · Caha v. United States · Glickstein v. United States · Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baird · Markham v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is contended that the commission alone, under the provisions of the act, has authority to determine what matters are material to an inquiry, and that this authority cannot be delegated to the examining officer. The argument is based on the provisions of § 19(b), heretofore quoted. There is nothing in the language of the section to justify the argument. To adopt such interpretation would be to emasculate the provision relating to the appointment of examining officers, and require all proceedings to be conducted by the commission itself.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.