97 N.J.L. 351
Decided February 2, 1922
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1922-02-02
<p>On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 95 N. J. L. 388.</p>
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1960
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1922-02-02
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in) the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice ICatzenbach in the Supreme Court.
¶2For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayzb, Trenchaed, Parker, Minturn, Iyalisch, Black, White, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskiek, JJ. 12.
¶3For reversal — None.