Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

972 F.2d 341

Docket No. 91-7731.

Riley v. Loomis

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 20, 1992 Decided: July 31, 1992

Relies on McCray v. State

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-07-31

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Jay Scott Riley, Appellant Pro Se.

William Rundahl Coleman, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Jay Scot Riley appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Riley v. Loomis, No. CA-90-621-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 18, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/972/f2d/341 · .json · Public domain