Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

972 F.2d 341

Docket No. 91-6324.

Royal v. Hadden

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: July 20, 1992 Decided: July 31, 1992

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-07-31

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · McCray v. State

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-07-31

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Valgene Royal, Appellant Pro Se.

Richard Bruce Conely, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

Valgene Royal appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendants in his Bivens* action. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Royal v. Hadden, No. CA-90-520-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/972/f2d/341 · .json · Public domain