Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

972 F.2d 342

Docket No. 92-6424.

United States v. Brice

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: July 20, 1992 Decided: August 4, 1992

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-08-04

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Sulfridge v. Lumber Company

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-08-04

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, District Judge. (CR-87-27-C)

Avery Nathaniel Brice, Appellant Pro Se.

Debra Jo Stuart, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

W.D.N.C.

Affirmed.

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Avery Nathaniel Brice appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Brice, No. CR-87-27-C (W.D.N.C. Apr. 6, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/972/f2d/342 · .json · Public domain