Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

972 F.2d 344

Docket No. 92-6561.

Paris Valentine v. Carol P. Getty United States Attorney

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: July 20, 1992 Decided: August 6, 1992

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-08-06

Relies on In Re: Alfred J. Vincent

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-08-06

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey, II, Senior District Judge. (CA-92-1256-H)

Paris Valentine, Appellant Pro Se.

D.Md.

Affirmed.

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Paris Valentine, a federal inmate, appeals from the district court's order dismissing for want of jurisdiction his petition challenging the validity of a parole detainer issued by the United States Parole Commission. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Valentine v. Getty, No. CA-92-1256-H (D. Md. May 12, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/972/f2d/344 · .json · Public domain