Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

972 F.2d 345

Docket No. 92-6632.

Woltz v. Clardy

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: July 20, 1992 Decided: August 6, 1992

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-08-06

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 2005

1 state decisions

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Wilkinson III v. United States of America

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-08-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-92-778)

Robert Walter Woltz, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

Affirmed.

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Robert Walter Woltz appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Woltz v. Clardy, No. CA-92-778 (E.D. Va. June 5, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/972/f2d/345 · .json · Public domain