Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

974 A.2d 1160

Frame v. Frame

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 23, 2009

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2009-06-23

Relies on Claudio v. Dean Machine Co. · Humphreys v. DeRoss · Jacobs v. Jacobs

Decided 2009-06-23

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 AND NOW, this 23rd day of June 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the order of the trial court is REINSTATED. See Humphreys v. DeRoss, 567 Pa. 614, 790 A.2d 281 (2002) (Section 4302 of the Domestic Relations Code does not include “gifts” in definition of income; a party’s assets may, however, be relevant in determination of an upward deviation from the Support Guidelines); accord, Jacobs v. Jacobs, 884 A.2d 301 (Pa.Super.2005); Pa.R.C.P. 1910.16-5.

/974/a2d/1160 · .json · Public domain