Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

974 F.2d 1331

Docket No. 92-6275.

Sabo v. State

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: July 10, 1992 Decided: August 25, 1992

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-08-25

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Jones v. Thompson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-08-25

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2017

2 district ·

40199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-90-1368)

Steve Sabo, Appellant Pro Se.

Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

D.S.C.

Dismissed.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Steve Sabo seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.* Sabo v. South Carolina, No. CA-90-1368 (D.S.C. Feb. 27, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

*

We also deny Sabo's Motion for Review and Reversal of his conviction

/974/f2d/1331 · .json · Public domain