Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

974 F.2d 1332

Docket No. 92-6376.

William R. Suggs v. C. T. Nulty G. H. Lewis Henry Fisher M. K. Basham G. W. Bean

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: July 31, 1992 Decided: September 14, 1992

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-09-14

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on United States of America v. Duarte

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-09-14

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (CA-91-674-R)

William R. Suggs, Appellant Pro Se.

Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

William R. Suggs appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Suggs v. Nulty, No. CA-91-674-R (W.D. Va. Mar 24, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/974/f2d/1332 · .json · Public domain