United States v. Walling’s Empirical Analysis
974 F.2d 140 · 1992
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently February 2015
8 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 471 (Counterfeit Deterrence Act of 1992)
Relies on Rideout v. United States · Amperex Electronic Corp. v. New York Racing Assn., Inc. · Lewis v. Adamson · Moody v. Smith · Spierings v. Alaska
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“similar offenses by whatever name they are known”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[D]riving a vehicle when a person has consumed alcohol or one or more drugs, or a combination of both alcohol and one or more drugs, which alcohol alone, or one or more drugs alone, or alcohol combined with one or more drugs, affects the person to the slightest degree so that the person is less able than the person ordinarily would have been, either mentally or physically, or both mentally and physically, to exercise clear judgment, sufficient physical control, or due care in the safe operation of a vehicle.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he IADA has no application if a prisoner in federal custody in one federal judicial district faces another federal indictment in a different federal judicial district.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hunter v. Fp Samples
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.