Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

978 F.2d 1254

Docket No. 92-6841.

Bernard v. Mardavitch

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: October 26, 1992 Decided: November 12, 1992

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-11-12

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Brown v. Kee

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-11-12

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-91-527)

Peter Emmanuel Bernard, Appellant Pro Se.

William Rundahl Coleman, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

E.D.Va.

Affirmed.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

Peter Emmanuel Bernard appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bernard v. Mardavitch, No. CA-91-527 (E.D. Va. July 31, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/978/f2d/1254 · .json · Public domain