Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

978 F.2d 1256

Docket No. 92-6780.

Shanks v. Doe

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: September 28, 1992 Decided: October 27, 1992

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-10-27

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2005

2 district ·

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on In Re: Warren Reginald Stevenson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-10-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-92-534)

Gary O. Shanks, Appellant Pro Se.

W.D.Va.

Affirmed.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

Gary O. Shanks appeals from the district court's order dismissing this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) action as frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Shanks v. Doe, No. CA-92-534 (W.D. Va. July 20, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/978/f2d/1256 · .json · Public domain