Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

979 F.2d 847

Docket No. 92-6833.

Peter Emmanuel Bernard v. Clarence L. Jackson, Jr. C. Hill

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: September 28, 1992 Decided: October 28, 1992

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-10-28

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently January 1993 · most notably Brown v. Bush (1992), Adrian Gerard Brockington v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General (1992)

24 federal appellate ·

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-10-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-92-233-R)

Peter Emmanuel Bernard, Appellant Pro Se.

Reneen Evat Hewlett, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

Peter Emmanuel Bernard appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bernard v. Jackson, No. CA-92-233-R (W.D. Va. July 13, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/979/f2d/847 · .json · Public domain