98 Cal. App. 4th 256 - Fry v. Saenz’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 705 · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12131 (§ 201 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (§ 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 601 (§ 401 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 608 (§ 408 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 619 (§ 419 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on School Board of Nassau County Florida v. H Arline · Alexander v. Choate · Tommy Olmstead Commissioner Georgia Department of Human Resourcess v. L C Jonathan Zimring · Townsend v. Swank · McPherson v. Michigan High School Athletic Ass'n
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.