Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 N.J. 122 - State v. White

State v. White’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

85
cited by 85 later decisions
5
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 80 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 85 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably State v. Tischio (1987), State v. Vasquez (1992)

3 federal appellate · 80 state decisions

4501984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Enmund v. Florida · State v. Maguire · State v. Des Marets · State v. Fair · 101 Wash. 2d 654 - State v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]n accomplice may be guilty of armed robbery even though he did not personally possess or use the firearm in the course of the commission of the robbery. The accomplice has committed the same crime as the individual who possessed or used the gun if the accomplice had the purpose to promote or facilitate that crime, namely, robbery with the use of a firearm. [ White, supra, 98 N.J. at 130 , 484 A. 2d 691 .]”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]ith the purpose of promoting or facilitating the commission of the offense; he (a) Solicits such other person to commit it; (b) Aids or agrees or attempts to aid such other person in planning or committing it; or (c) Having a legal duty to prevent the commission of the offense, fails to make proper effort so to do. [N.J.S.A 2C:2—6(c)(1).]”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A person acts purposely with respect to the nature of his conduct or a result thereof if it is his conscious object to engage in conduct of that nature or to cause such a result. A person acts purposely with respect to attendant circumstances if he is aware of the existence of such circumstances or he believes or hopes that they exist.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.