98 N.J.L. 292
Decided September 29, 1922
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1922-09-29
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1922-09-29
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 1978
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kalisch in the Supreme Court.
¶2For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayzb, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, Heppenhetmer, Gardner, Van Buskirk, JJ. 10.
¶3For reversal — None.