98 N.J.L. 901
Decided April 20, 1923
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1923-04-20
<p>On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 96 N. J. L. 341.</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1936
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1923-04-20
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.
¶2For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Kalis ch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heepenheimer, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 11.
¶3For reversal — None.