Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 Ohio App. 3d 301 - Brooks v. Wilson

98 Ohio App. 3d 301 - Brooks v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2021

17 state decisions

901994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc. · Cedar Bay Construction, Inc. v. City of Fremont · 7 Ohio App. 3d 182 - Verbon v. Pennese · 9 Ohio App. 3d 297 - Lance v. Leohr · 86 Ohio App. 3d 209 - McDonald v. City of Akron

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(A) Grounds {¶ 27} "A new trial may be granted to all or any of the parties and on all or part of the issues upon any of the following grounds: . . . {¶ 28} "(6) The judgment is not sustained by the weight of the evidence; however, only one new trial may be granted on the weight of the evidence in the same case; {¶ 29} (7) The judgment is contrary to law . . .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]n a civil action, where the prevailing party is wholly free from fault, and the irregularity or misconduct of the jury, or a juror, is free from intention of wrong, and has in no appreciable way affected the verdict, it should not be disturbed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “obtained no information that had not already been presented at trial”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.