Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 980 F.2d 1165 - Watson v. Jones

Watson v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

980 F.2d 1165 · 1992

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
August 2023
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably Reich v. ConAgra, Inc. (1993), Freitas v. Ault (1997)

16 federal appellate · 3 district ·

1501992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Robinson v. Monaghan · Timm v. Gunter · Williams v. Adams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the district court: whether the record, viewed in a light most favorable to the non-moving party, shows that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.