Miranda v. Deloitte LLP’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson · Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A strong presumption exists[, however,] that a parent corporation is not the employer of its subsidiary's employees, and it is therefore deemed a separate employer unless it meets the joint employment test or the integrated employer test.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a joint employer relationship exists where two or more employers exert significant control over the same employees and share or co-determine those matters governing essential terms and conditions of employment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he First Circuit has explained that, under the 'single employer' or 'integrated employer' doctrine, two nominally separate companies may be so interrelated that they constitute a single employer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.