Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

981 F.2d 1251

Docket No. 92-7061.

Milton McCray v. Christopher J. Romano, Assistant Attorney General in His Individual and Official Capacities

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: November 30, 1992 Decided: December 29, 1992

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-12-29

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Muhammad v. Murray C/o

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-12-29

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Joseph C. Howard, District Judge. (CA-92-1005-JH)

Milton McCray, Appellant Pro Se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Milton McCray, a Maryland inmate, appeals from the district court's order dismissing his complaint brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) and denying his motion to vacate the judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McCray v. Romano, No. CA-92-1005-JH (D. Md. Apr. 22 and Oct. 1, 1992). We also deny McCray's motion for, and dispense with, oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/981/f2d/1251 · .json · Public domain