Holland v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 22, 1998

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1998-12-22

Relies on Holland v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-12-22

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 2017

6 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Earl Holland (Movant) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. On a previous appeal in this case, this Court remanded for an evidentiary hearing. Holland v. State, 954 S.W.2d 660 (Mo.App.1997). Following the hearing, the court issued a judgment denying Movant’s motion, specifically finding Mov-ant’s testimony to not be credible.

¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).