Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

989 F.2d 497

Docket No. 92-6252.

James L. Watkins, Jr. v. M. E. Baumgarner Attorney General of North Carolina

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: January 12, 1993 Decided: March 30, 1993

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-03-30

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States v. Wilder

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-03-30

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-90-614-HC-F)

James L. Watkins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

James L. Watkins, Jr., appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Watkins v. Baumgarner, No. CA-90-614-HC-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 1992). We deny Watkins' motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/989/f2d/497 · .json · Public domain