Issac v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently December 2016
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cain v. State · Williams v. State · Fowler v. State · Perez v. State · Issac v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) if the appellant has timely requested a reporter’s record; (2) if, without the appellant’s fault, a significant exhibit or a significant portion of the court reporter’s notes and records has been lost or destroyed ... (3) if the lost, destroyed or inaudible portion of the reporter’s record, or the lost or destroyed exhibit, is necessary to the appeal’s resolution; and (4) if the parties cannot agree on a complete reporter’s record.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“At the request of the parties, the undersigned judge directed Brenna DeMoss, official court reporter for County Criminal Court at Law No. 11 of Harris County, Texas, to review the audio files, and stenographic notes submitted to ■ the Court by Ms. Humphrey. Ms. DeMoss could not reconstruct a complete reporter’s record based upon the audio and stenographic notes submitted to the Court by Ms. Humphrey. Ms. Humphrey’s medical condition, personal, and professional problems during the latter part of 2013, and early -2014, up to-and including the contempt hearings [in this case and eight other cases] indicate she may not have been in a condition to'transcribe the proceedings, or otherwise conduct herself in a professional manner. The appellant timely filed a notice of appeal. This case did not involve a waiver of a court reporter, nor was it a mere formality or summary proceeding. The appellant bears no fault for Ms. Humphrey’s failure .to complete and file the reporter’s record. The reporter’s record is necessary to the appeal’s resolution. The reporter’s record cannot be replaced by agreement of the parties to the facts contained in the record, if [no] complete and legible record exists. The exhibits or copies of’the exhibits are available.' Based upon Ms. Humphrey’s representations to this court regarding the status of the reporter’s record, and her failure to either file the completed record or provide the court with stenographic notes capable of being transcribed by another of”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.