99 N.J. Eq. 422
Decided February 1, 1926
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1926-02-01
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1926-02-01
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 1958
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.
¶2 For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 14.
¶3 For reversal — None.