99 N.J.L. 527
124 A 926
Decided April 11, 1924
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1924-04-11
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1924-04-11
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 1978
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.
¶2 For ajjirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Minturn,. Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, 'Van Buskiric, Clark, JJ. 11.
¶3 For reversal — None.