Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

440 U.S. 445

99 S. Ct. 1200

59 L. Ed. 2d 442

Docket No. 77-1255.

Anders v. Floyd

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 1979.

Rehearing Denied April 23, 1979.

Supreme Court of the United States · decided Rehearing Denied April 23, 1979.

Relies on Roe v. Wade · Colautti v. Franklin · National Broadcasting Co Inc v. Niemi a-652

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Vacated and remanded · 8–1 · Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided Rehearing Denied April 23, 1979.

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1998

8 federal appellate ·

40197919801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

See 441 U.S. 928, 99 S.Ct. 2043.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

The motion of Legal Defense Fund for Unborn Children for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, is denied.

¶2

The motion of David Gaetano for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, is granted.

¶3

Appellee was indicted by a grand jury of Richland County, S. C., for criminal abortion and murder in connection with the abortion of a 25-week-old fetus. The District Court enjoined the prosecution, concluding that under Roe v. Wade,410 U.S. 113, 98 S.Ct. 705, 35 L.Ed.2d 147, (1973), there was no possibility of obtaining a constitutionally binding conviction of appellee. 440 F.Supp. 535 (1977). Because the District Court may have reached this conclusion on the basis of an erroneous concept of "viability," which refers to potential, rather than actual, survival of the fetus outside the womb, Colautti v. Franklin,439 U.S. 379, 389, 99 S.Ct. 675, 682, 58 L.Ed.2d 596 (1979) the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina for further consideration in light ofColautti.

¶4

In addition, it is suggested, in view of the alternative constructions of the South Carolina criminal statutes that are available, that the District Court give further consideration to the possibility of abstention, at least in part, in deference to the pendency of the state-court proceeding.

¶5

Vacated and remanded.

¶6

Mr. Justice STEWART dissents.

/440/us/445 · .json · Public domain