Duran v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
August 2017
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Elliott v. Commonwealth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"While Duran claims that the more persuasive approach finds self-defense is relevant to the "reckless” element of the offense, this Court is inclined to follow "[t]he majority of jurisdictions hold[ing] that self-defense requires intentional conduct.” A charge of recklessness involves an unintentional act. The trial court gave proper instructions to the jury on the elements of the offense and the definitions of "recklessness" and "proximate cause." The jury had the applicable law before it. The trial court did not err in refusing to submit an instruction on self-defense to the jury.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Holloman v. State“[t]he risk must be of such a nature and degree that disregard thereof constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of conduct that a reasonable person would observe in the situation” and further notes that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Clark v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.