Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

991 F.2d 791

Docket No. 93-6043.

Stanton v. Busch

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: March 29, 1993 Decided: April 26, 1993

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-04-26

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Tyrus G. Smith Bonnie S. Smith v. Mack Trucks, Incorporated

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-04-26

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-90-1445-8-19)

James Robert Stanton, Appellant Pro Se.

Michael Todd Smith, WATKINS, VANDIVER, KIRVEN, GABLE & GRAY, Anderson, South Carolina; W. Howard Boyd, Jr., RAINEY, BRITTON, GIBBES & CLARKSON, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before LUTTIG, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

James Robert Stanton appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Stanton v. Busch, No. CA-90-1445-8-19 (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/991/f2d/791 · .json · Public domain