992 A.2d 845
Decided April 8, 2010
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2010-04-08
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 2025
5 state decisions
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“Whether the Superior Court erred in reversing [Holmes’] judgment of sentence, based on a misapplication of the relevant precedent permitting stops of motor vehicles for an alleged violation of 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 4524(c) (windshield obstructions and wipers)?”
quoted by 1 later decision, including Commonwealth v. Holmes
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2010-04-08
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1ORDER
¶2AND NOW, this 8th day of April, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED as to the following issue:
¶3Whether the Superior Court erred in reversing the Defendant’s judgment of sentence, based on a misapplication of the relevant precedent permitting stops of motor vehicles for an alleged violation of 75 Pa.C.S. § 4524(c) (windshield obstructions and wipers)?