Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 996 F.2d 1384 - Sweeney v. Bane

Sweeney v. Bane’s Empirical Analysis

996 F.2d 1384 · 1993

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
June 2013
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently June 2013 · most notably Heideman v. South Salt Lake City (2003), Rodriguez v. Debuono (1999)

16 federal appellate · 6 district ·

310199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1396 (§ 1900 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396O (§ 1916 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Plaza Health Laboratories, Inc. v. Perales · Resolution Trust Corp. v. Elman · Eng v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he Second Circuit has held, and we agree, that ‘[wjhere ... a preliminary injunction seeks to stay governmental action taken in the public interest pursuant to a statutory or regulatory scheme, the less rigorous fair-ground-for-litigation standard should not be applied.’”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(a) irreparable harm and (b) either (1) likelihood of success on the merits or (2) sufficiently serious questions going to the merits to make them a fair ground for litigation and a balance of hardships tipping decidedly toward the party requesting preliminary relief.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.