Corbin v. Blankenburg

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Argued March 12, 1993. Decided Aug. 2, 1993.

NOTE: SUPERSEDED OPINION AT 999 F.2d 1043. DATED Oct. 4, 1993.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1993

Relies on Corbin v. Blankenburg

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-10-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 999 F.2d 1037w

¶226 Fed.R.Serv.3d 730, 16 Employee Benefits Cas. 2755,
Pens. Plan Guide P 23883I

¶3Gary CORBIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Karl BLANKENBURG; John Cruz; Charles Furlotte; Robert
Kuschel; Joseph Laughhunn; Robert Ledbetter; David
Margolis; David McEachin; Robert Stephens; Jerome Wilson;
Robert Udell, Present or Former Trustees of the Pattern &
Model Makers Association of Warren & Vicinity Pension Fund
(Defined Benefit); Mid-Continental Claim Service and
Administrators, Inc.; Gary Novara; and Laurence Breskin,
Defendants-Appellees.

¶4No. 92-1540.

¶5United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

¶6Argued March 12, 1993.
Decided Aug. 2, 1993.

¶7NOTE: SUPERSEDED OPINION AT 999 F.2d 1043. DATED Oct. 4, 1993.