Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

Adulteration

Definitions from Case Law · United States Supreme Court

Definitions from Case Law

From 232 U.S. 399 - United States of America v. Lexington Mill & Elevator Company · 1914Most cited · 319 citing opinions

'may render injurious to health'

It is not required that the article of food containing added poisonous or other added deleterious ingredients must affect the public health, and it is not incumbent upon the government in order to make out a case to establish that fact. The act has placed upon the government the burden of establishing, in order to secure a verdict of condemnation under this statute, that the added poisonous or deleterious substances must be such as may render such article injurious to health. The word 'may' is here used in its ordinary and usual signification, there being nothing to show the intention of Congress to affix to it any other meaning. It is, says Webster, 'an auxiliary verb, qualifying the meaning of another verb, by expressing ability, ... contingency or liability, or possibility or probability.

How often courts cite the case defining “Adulteration”

191019201940196019802000201049

Court decisions citing the opinion that defined “Adulteration” — 318 in all, by decade. Counts are citations to the defining case as a whole, not verified uses of the term. The dip in the most recent years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the latest years.