Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

may

Definitions from Case Law · United States Supreme Court

Definitions from Case Law

From 71 U.S. 435 - Supervisors v. United States · 1866Most cited · 242 citing opinions

permissive statutory language for public officers

where power is given to public officers, in the language of the act before us, or in equivalent language—whenever the public interest or individual rights call for its exercise—the language used, though permissive in form, is in fact peremptory. What they are empowered to do for a third person the law requires shall be done. The power is given, not for their benefit, but for his. It is placed with the depositary to meet the demands of right, and to prevent a failure of justice. It is given as a remedy to those entitled to invoke its aid, and who would otherwise be remediless. In all such cases it is held that the intent of the legislature, which is the test, was not to devolve a mere discretion, but to impose 'a positive and absolute duty.

How often courts cite the case defining “may”

1860187519001925195019752000201038

Court decisions citing the opinion that defined “may” — 240 in all, by decade. Counts are citations to the defining case as a whole, not verified uses of the term. The dip in the most recent years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the latest years.

All 2 definitions, chronological · 1866–1866

  1. must' or 'shall' in cases where the public interest and right are concerned, and where the public or third parties have a claim de jure , that the power should be exercised.